If you live in England and you haven’t checked your mail this week, run to the box now. Chances are you’ve been selected for the tour of South Africa.
Forget about building towards the next world cup, there are enough guys in Lancaster’s new squad to split up and play a 20-team tournament right now. If they all jumped a ferry railing at once, they’d empty Auckland Harbour.
Forty-two players have been picked. With such an inclusive policy, it’s hard to imagine any controversy. But there is. Eyebrows have been raised at the selection of 13 rookies. And rightly so because it continues England’s effrontery toward three-quarters of the test schedule.
The callow nature of the side is being driven by preparation for the next world cup. For God’s sake, people, we’re as far away from “the next world cup” as we can possibly be. There will be internationals whose whole careers start and finish before England hosts the tournament in 2015. To start picking a team now for then is like Christmas shopping on Boxing Day.
When will England realise how destructive it is to sacrifice all else for the world cup? Especially when you don’t win it, which is what normally happens. If they’re blown away by South Africa this summer, it won’t be the first time their misguided ambition has brought test footy into disrepute. The developmental shambles they sent down under in 1998 lost four tests by a combined total of 166 points, including a 76-0 loss to Australia. Guess which of those two teams won the next world cup…
Thing is, winning the goblet is really hard to do. Counting on a world title to wipe away four years of failure is a JP Morgan-esque approach to risk management. What’s more, winning them is only going to get tougher.
The Southern Hemisphere super powers aren’t going anywhere. Argentina will be on the rise for the next decade and the race in Europe is tightening up, thanks to the resurgence of Wales. Even if you’re better than all of them, you gotta get by lady luck.To put all one’s eggs in the world cup basket is to lay waste. Literally.
Wouldn’t it be better just to take care of winning tests and let the world cups fall where they may? That still demands player turnover and development but in a far more measured way. It also promotes a competitive test match calendar, year-round, decade-long. Imagine it, every test could be like a world cup semi. Not just the world cup semi.
Lancaster’s cavalier selection is precisely what the new three test-tour format was supposed to end. Northern hemisphere teams have long used southern tours as glorified training camps, getting hammered in the process. How they can live with the shame of annual trouncings, I don’t know. To add insult to injury, their inevitable capitulation makes it very tough for host countries to interest their fans in turning out. While SANZAR teams go up there and pack out European stadiums every spring to generate revenues for the home nations, our northern pals don’t have the courtesy to send a competitive squad.
Lancaster is, of course, the darling of English rugby right now. His selection is being portrayed as a breath of fresh air from a bold change-agent. Forgive my cynicism, but from where I sit he’s just more of the same. Another world cup-ofile with no ambition to make England genuinely good, year-in, year-out. He just hopes to slip under the radar, pinch a world cup in 2015 and spend the rest of his life on the speaker’s circuit.


